“Use case” language can hide what AI adoption changes
Claim
“Use case” language can hide the relationships, dependencies, judgment, informal knowledge, and human connection that change when AI is adopted.
Stance
Supported by the source articles as an AI-in-education claim.
Evidence
-
Use vs Relationship: What We’re Not Asking About AI supports this claim through its discussion of AI use, learning, assessment, wellbeing, or implementation in context.
-
Use vs Relationship: What We’re Not Asking About AI supports this claim through its discussion of strongly relevant for AI policy, school implementation, institutional design, and AI literacy because it asks schools to evaluate relationships with knowledge and judgment, not just workflow efficiency.
-
The Car Wash Problem supports this claim through its discussion of AI literacy, assessment, implementation, or learning design in context.
-
The Waning Days of Techno-Futurism supports this claim through its discussion of AI literacy, assessment, implementation, or learning design in context.
Practical implication
AI planning should ask what relationships and forms of human judgment are being changed, not only which tasks become faster.