Treating normal AI use as pathology can lead to worse school policy
Claim
If schools pathologize AI use too quickly, they may move toward blunt prohibition instead of AI literacy, harm reduction, targeted safeguards, and referral pathways.
Stance
Supported by the source articles as an AI-in-education claim.
Evidence
-
Are We Pathologizing AI Use Too Quickly? supports this claim through its discussion of AI use, learning, assessment, wellbeing, or implementation in context.
-
Are We Pathologizing AI Use Too Quickly? supports this claim through its discussion of highly relevant for K-12 AI policy, student wellbeing, counselor referral pathways, harm reduction, and district-level implementation.
Practical implication
Districts should distinguish clinical risk, problematic use, and normal high use before turning sensational AI harm language into policy.