The Writing Doom Loop

Source: Alex Kotran Substack
Author: Alex Kotran, Nathan Kriha
Original source: https://alexkotran.substack.com/p/the-writing-doom-loop

Private backup: the full article text is archived in the private repository at archives/articles/alexkotran-substack-com-the-writing-doom-loop.source.md. It is not published on the public Quartz site.

Summary

Alex Kotran and Nathan Kriha argue that generative AI is weakening writing’s ability to signal skill, effort, originality, and thought. They use research on Freelancer.com proposals to show how AI-generated applications can make high- and low-skill candidates appear more similar, creating a hiring “doom loop” in which polished writing loses predictive value. They extend the same logic to admissions essays, online writing, and school assessment. The educational danger is that students may bypass the productive struggle through which writing develops synthesis, perspective, voice, and agency.

Big ideas

Claims

Key evidence and examples

  • The article cites research on Freelancer.com showing that AI-assisted proposals made application quality less predictive of actual worker ability.
  • A simulated labor-market result suggested top-quintile workers were hired less often and bottom-quintile workers more often when applications lost signal value.
  • The authors compare this to a market-for-lemons problem in which readers cannot distinguish high-effort human writing from cheap synthetic text.
  • College admissions essays and AI screening tools are used as examples of institutions responding to signal collapse with more automation.

Education relevance

Highly relevant for writing instruction, academic integrity, college readiness, admissions, assessment design, and the question of why writing still matters when AI can generate polished prose.

My notes